Category Archives: Quotes

APM Charter statement

The following statement from the UK Association of Project Managers about the Chartered Status, which they have been pursuing for many years.

Statement:

In August 2012, the then APM chairman Mike Nichols released a statement on behalf of the association restating its case for achieving Chartered status on behalf of the project management profession.

The statement reiterated APM’s belief that it remains for the Privy Council to decide, in the light of its published guidance and the individual circumstances of the organisation, whether a Charter ought to be granted.

APM is now in a position to provide an update on its application for the benefit of its members, supporters and other stakeholders.

In February 2013, Association for Project Management (“APM”) was informed that, in his role as the Lead Privy Council Adviser in this matter, the Minister for the Cabinet Office had decided to recommend that a Royal Charter should be granted to APM.

APM’s application was then considered by a committee of the Privy Council that included the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, and the Secretary of State for Defence.  In July 2013, APM was informed that this committee had unanimously reached its recommendation that a Royal Charter should be granted to APM, and that this recommendation would be placed on the list of business for the meeting of the Privy Council to be held in October 2013.

This decision was subsequently challenged by Project Management Institute (“PMI”) who sought permission for Judicial Review, naming the Minister for the Cabinet Office, the Privy Council Office and the Attorney General as Defendants, and APM as an interested party.

A substantive hearing of the Judicial Review claim has now been scheduled for 8th and 9th July 2014 at the High Court in London.  In the event that the claim is finally rejected by the court, this would allow APM’s application for chartered status to progress to a formal meeting of the Privy Council.

Background information on APM’s application for a Royal Charter can be found at http://www.apm.org.uk/CharteredStatus.

The Privy Council Office provides briefing on Royal Charters and the application process at: http://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/royal-charters/.

Leave a comment

Filed under News, Project Management, Quotes

Team Animation confirm time slot at Project Challenge

We are very pleased that Donnie MacNicholl   from Team Animation will be taking up residence at the Aspire Europe stand on the 12th March between 9.30am and 1pm

Team Animation are thought leaders in the arena of programme and project leadership, Donnie will be available to discuss the challenges and share experiences on how organisations have addressed these challenges

Donnie has posed the question –

Are you leading a VUCA project?”. For those who know what VUCA is, those who may think they do and for those who are intrigued – VUCA is an acronym for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, Ambiguous. Some possibly think it is only programs that should be like this so come along and discuss.

If you would like to book a specific slot with Donnie, please email Alice on coursemanager@aspireeurope.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Articles, Programme Management, Project Management, Quotes

Aspire Europe become APM Corporate Members

Aspire Europe are pleased to announce that they are now APM Corporate Members.

Rod Sowden, Aspire Europe Ltd Managing Director, said “This is  overdue on our part, many of our team are individual members but we think it is important for our organisation to be seen as supporting the development of our profession. We have had a key role in the development of OGC best practice as lead authors and contributors, as that environment is changing we are looking forward to a closer relationship with the APM in the future.  In the coming months we will be offering their qualifications and hopefully Apprenticeships later this year”

Leave a comment

Filed under News, Quotes

Global review of PMO: Analysis 2013

 

The key findings include:

  • The Agile Question: Only 9 percent of those surveyed said they use Agile on more than half their projects.
  • Significant drop in soft skills training: only 30 percent* said their PMO provided soft skills training in 2013 compared to 41 percent in 2012.
  • More PMO effectiveness measurement: 68 percent* claimed the PMO reported on its own effectiveness in 2013, compared to only 54 percent in 2012.
  • Fewer PMOs Challenged: only 37 percent* stated their PMO was challenged in 2013 compared to 56 percent in 2012.
  • PMO as career-crucial body: 75 percent of so-called “active” PMOs that engaged in learning sustainment and training impact measurement also create a structured career pathway for project managers.
  • More Strategic: 22 percent of all PMOs operate at the strategic level.
  •  Project Success: 56 percent of active PMOs claimed more than 75 percent of on-time, to-budget project delivery

Watch the presentation

For decades, researchers have been trying to grapple with the concept of the Project/Program Management Office (PMO) and how it works to improve overall business performance. Because project management has become integral across all industries and sectors, the PMO plays a vital role in offering strategic, tactical or operational guidance in day-to-day business through its involvement in project and program delivery.

In its third annual survey with over 2300 respondents worldwide, ESI International has taken on the challenge of investigating the global PMO landscape. With a relatively even split amongst the respondents from APAC (29%), Europe (31%) and the Americas (35%) along with some representation from Africa and the Middle East (5%), the survey sought to reveal the latest PMO trends in light of its function, scope and approach. With three out of four project, program and portfolio managers claiming their organization has a PMO, the survey offers representative insights into the PMO’s current role, maturity level and involvement in training.

The results this year reinforce the belief that, while the PMO continues to be challenged by senior management and the C-level, the PMO is still vastly considered a valuable body within the enterprise. As with anything, the more investment that is made in the people, the more valuable the efforts are perceived. The same applies to the PMO.

Some of the survey’s findings are highlighted here:

Training and Development on a Downslide:

In its efforts to monitor the level to which PMOs are the hub of training, ESI found the percentage of PMOs involved in training and development efforts has dropped significantly in every area.

At the same time, PMOs are also managing more people than ever before, suggesting that the PMO is working with more project professionals in general without taking on an increased training function.

 The PMO’s Visibility Increasing:

Compared to 2012, the number of respondents reporting that the PMO is measuring its own effectiveness increased by about 15 percent. This finding suggests there has been a significant rise in visibility as the PMO seeks to justify its existence through metrics that prove its value. At the same time, the distribution of methods with which they measured their effectiveness, whether it was project success, return on investment (ROI) or on-time, to budget project delivery, remained the same from last year.

 Fewer PMOs Challenged:

On the whole, the PMO was challenged less by its various stakeholders than it was in 2012. Nevertheless, the so-called “active PMOs”, ones that engaged the most in learning sustainment and workplace performance measurement, remained the most challenged ones. This finding indicates a heightened dialogue between stakeholders and the more visible PMO, which can be interpreted as a positive development in the PMO’s evolution. No one talks about a body that doesn’t matter. In other words, the increased challenges of the most visible PMOs suggest their role is worth examining, refining and redefining as necessary.

 PMO as Career Paver:

The PMO has proven to be a career-crucial body for project managers. Not surprisingly, the PMOs that measure both workplace performance and engage actively in learning sustainment tend to be the most involved in structuring the PM’s career path. It is no wonder, then, that these PMOs are also viewed as the most valuable to the people benefiting from the PMO’s activities. Three out of four active PMOs were reported as providing a structured path for project managers, compared to a global mean of 41 percent.

 Strategic PMOs Most Mature:

Just under half of the PMOs surveyed were tactical or tactical with some strategic reach (46 percent). About one in five (22 percent) was strategic and roughly one in three (30 percent) was operational in nature. The survey found that the PMOs with a strategic function, as opposed to a tactical or operational one, tended to be the most mature. According to the PMO Maturity Cube model by Américo Pinto, et al., it is not so much the function that defines the PMOs level of maturity, but whether or not it fulfils its pre-defined role as either an operational, tactical or strategic body within the organization. In this survey, however, strategic PMOs with an enterprise-wide approach proved to be the most mature.

The Value of Performance Measurement:

In 2013 PMO maturity has increased across all stages for those PMOs that were active in both measuring the impact of training on workplace performance and learning sustainment. PMOs that were active in both measuring the impact of training on workplace performance and learning sustainment have higher perceptions of:

PMO Role Fulfilment 42 percent of respondents rated their active PMOs as either “Excellent” or “Very Good” compared with 28 percent of those who are active in neither area.

Project Success 56 percent of those respondents with PMOs active in measuring both training impact and learning sustainment claimed more than 75 percent of projects were delivered on time, to budget, within scope and to customer expectation compared with 39 percent for those who are active in neither.

PMO Maturity – on average active PMOs were deemed to be 14 percent more mature across all six evolutionary stages as identified by ESI compared with those who are active in neither.

PMO Effectiveness Measurement – 64 percent (compared to 45 percent globally) used increased customer satisfaction as their effectiveness measuring stick; 43 percent used ROI (compared to 24 percent globally); and

54 percent reported using a raised PM profile (compared to 35 percent globally) as their preferred method for measuring effectiveness.

 Much Agile About Nothing:

Despite all the media hype, Agile is not being used nearly as much as we had expected. Fewer than half the organizations claimed to take an Agile approach at all. The PMO’s role in supporting Agile teams is most likely found in the area of coaching and mentoring.

 The Final Word

While PMO training activity is down across the board, those strategic PMOs that have shown a dedication to project professionals’ career path by engaging in training impact measurement and sustained learning activities were viewed as most mature and valuable to the organization. They also reported the highest project success rate. The trend toward increased effectiveness measurement is also a positive one.

The PMO has reached a point in its evolution to be considered a service provider whose contract could be cancelled should it not deliver the promised value. Similarly, the PMO could possibly lose executive sponsorship and financial backing if it is unable to prove its value or justify the investment the organization has made.

Ultimately, the PMO’s success is reliant on understanding customer needs and how to meet them while offering clear, measurable results. The PMO maturation process requires the ability to meet new needs as they arise, raise its level of service to meet new demands and provide new services as required.

The PMO is best positioned to take the temperature of its staff, continuously adding value, optimizing business performance and ensuring project professionals receive the resources required to deliver on time and within the scope and budget set out before them.

About ESI International

ESI is a global, project-focused training company. Our clients tell us that we’re better and different because we take them beyond traditional training to achieve sustained, measurable results. Our staff/professionals are dedicated and passionate about enabling organisations to improve vital skills to achieve great things now and prepare them for what’s next. We do this by putting you in control of how you manage your projects, your people and your contracts and bringing certainty to your commitments. We are built to make you better.

Website: www.esi-intl.co.uk • Email: enquiry@esi-intl.co.uk • Tel: +44 (0)207 017 7100

Leave a comment

Filed under Articles, Learning, Programme & Portfolio Office, Programme Management, Project Management, Quotes

Quote of the day- Ogden’s Law

“The sooner you fall behind the more time you have to catch up” – Ogden’s Law

Seems like this could be the project managers law, as most plans seem to start going wrong on day 1, the problem is they don’t seem to notice until the time to catch up has been used on something else.

Leave a comment

Filed under Learning, Programme Management, Project Management, Quotes

Interesting Quote

Many of the things you can count, don’t count. Many of the thing you can’t count, really count” – Albert Einstein

How very true this is, programmes and projects rarely report on the things that really matter, like benefits realisation and stakeholder satisfaction – Albert must have been thinking of MSP when he wrote that !!

Leave a comment

Filed under Quotes

Parliament call for greater SRO accountability

Accountability for Public Money – PAC report – 05 04 11

This is a report issues by the Parliamentary Accounts Committee which has called for significant changes in the individual accountability for major projects. 

Recommendation number 6 reads – Accountability for the delivery of major projects and programmes must be clear so those responsible for delivery can be held to account.

There are weaknesses in personal responsibility and accountability for major projects due to the high turnover and lack of central oversight of Senior Responsible Owners. Government acknowledges that there is a shortage in project management expertise. This dilutes control over major projects, has led to cost overruns and delays and further weakens accountability to Parliament. The Cabinet Office is updating its current approach to enhancing project management expertise. At a project level, Senior Responsible Owners should be held accountable for delivering projects within an agreed budget and timeframe and should have authority to direct those involved in delivering the project. For all major projects and programmes, the Accounting Officer should nominate a Senior Responsible Owner who is accountable to Parliament alongside the departmental Accounting Officer. Steps should be taken to reduce the present turnover of staff, which undermines efficiency and effectiveness and makes a nonsense of personal responsibility and accountability.

Leave a comment

Filed under Articles, Learning, News, Quotes